1. "Movements trying to constrain corporate power through democratic institutions and direct action." (Structural Adjustment, Peace/Human Rights, Land Reform, Cyberpunk, Explicit Anti-Corporate Movements).

2. "Movements attempting a completely different kind of 'globalization from below' in which corporations will be reshaped in the service of new international democratic structures that will be populist, participatory and just." (Environmentalism, Labour, Socialism, Anti-FTA, Zapatista).

3. "Movements seeking to delink their localities and communities from the global economy and rebuild instead small-scale societies in which large corporations have no role at all." (Anarchism, Sustainable Development, Small Businesses, Sovereignty Movements, Religious Nationalism).

Geopolitical analyst Peter Schwartz offers a typical view in his column "Boom, Interrupted." Red Herring (May 1 & 15, 2001). pp. 134-137. "Opposition to globalization is concentrated in the rich youth of the industrialized world and does not appear to be a broad-based movement. Indeed, most businesspeople and workers in developing countries are in favor of globalization but demand an equitable deal, like reduced agriculture and textile tariffs in Europe. By almost every measure, globalization is increasing . . . foreign companies still want to participate in the U.S. boom. The United States still has a positive feedback loop going with the rest of the world." (p. 136) My own analysis suggests that this movement's intent is not anti-globalist per se, but rather anti-corporatist. For discussion, see John Ralston Saul. The Unconscious Civilization. New York: The Free Press, 1997.

[32] Col. John B. Alexander (ret). Ibid. p. 162.

[33] Col. John B. Alexander (ret). Ibid. p. 163.

[34] Ken Wilber. A Theory of Everything: An Integral Model for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, 2000. p. 130.

[35] Mark D. Alleyne. Ibid. p. 3.

[36] Mark D. Alleyne. Ibid. pp. 111-112.

[37] Herbert J. Gans. "Multiperspectival News." In Elliot D. Cohen (ed.). Philosophical Issues in Journalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. p. 193.

[38] Brian McNair. The Sociology of Journalism. New York: Arnold/Oxford University Press, 1998. p. 33.

[39] Herbert J. Gans. Ibid. p. 196.

[40] Chris Paterson. "Global Battlefields." In Oliver Boyd-Barrett and Terhi Rantanen (ed.). The Globalization of News. London: Sage Publications, 1998. p. 82.

[41] Mark D. Alleyne. Ibid. p. 13.

[42] McKenzie Wark. Virtual Geography: Living With Global Media Events. Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 1994. p. 11.

[43] McKenzie Wark. Ibid. p. 13.

[44] Mark D. Alleyne. Ibid. p. 94.

[45] Philip Seib. Ibid. p. 137. See also: C. Anthony Gifford. "International Agencies Global Issues: The Decline of the Cold War News Frame." In Abbas Malek and Anandam P. Kavoori (ed.). The Global Dynamics of News. Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing, 2000. pp. 389-408.

[46] Philip Seib. Ibid. p. 98.

[47] Howard Bloom. "The Puppets of Pandemonium: Sleaze and Sloth in the Media Elite." In Russ Kick (ed.). You Are Being Lied To. New York: Disinfo Books/RSUB, 2001. p. 35. See also in-depth discussion in: Susan D. Moeller. Compassion Fatigue: How The Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.

[48] Greg Bishop. "The Covert News Network." In Russ Kick (ed.) You Are Being Lied To. New York: Disinfo Books/RSUB. pp. 40-43. Bishop cites the discovery by Carl Bernstein, whilst researching a 1977 Rolling Stone article, that 400 journalists, publishers and media moguls were in the CIA's pay. For discussion of the intelligence community's structure, see: Jeffrey T. Richelsen. The U.S. Intelligence Community (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.

[49] Philip Seib. Ibid. pp. 78-83. Bruce D. Berkowitz and Allan E. Goodman contend that "efforts at "intelligence reform" have been mainly reactions to specific cases in which the intelligence community has failed in its mission or performed improperly. Rarely has reform been aimed at understanding the basic mission of intelligence and how it must adapt to changes in the larger society, economy, and global environment." (Berkowitz and Goodman, pp. 17-18). They remind conspiracy theorists that the military-information organizational model is Weberian (Berkowitz and Goodman, p. 67), being hierarchical, linear and isolated. A Marxist counter-argument is: Les Levidow and Ken Robins (ed.). Cyborg Worlds: The Military-Information Society. London: Free Association Books, 1989.

[50] John Naisbitt, Nana Naisbitt, and Douglas Philips. High Tech High Touch: Technology and Our Search for Meaning. New York: Broadway Books, 1999. p. 13.

[51] Mark D. Alleyne. Ibid. p. 19.

[52] Howard Bloom. Ibid. p. 31.

[53] Mark D. Alleyne. Ibid. pp. 54-56.

[55] Marshall McLuhan. Ibid. p. 343.

[56] Nick Mamatas. "The Public Relations Firms of Dictators.".

[57] Karl Grossman. "Space Corps: The Dangerous Business of Making The Heavens A War Zone." Covert Action Quarterly, (No. 70) April-June 2001. p. 26.

[58] Michael Krepon. "Lost In Space: The Misguided Drive Toward Anti-satellite Weapons." Foreign Affairs. May-June 2001. pp. 2-8. Donald Rumsfeld (ed.). "Space Management and Organization." Commission to Assess United States National Security. Karl Grossman and Judith Long. "Lost In Space." The Nation.

[59] Douglas Rushkoff. Coercion: Why We Listen To What 'They' Say. New York: Riverhead Books, 1999. pp. 160-163.