Every year on October 12, in the US, the Caribbean, and Latin America, there are memorial celebrations that commemorate the "discovery" of the Americas by Christopher Columbus. These celebrations proclaim Columbus as a great navigator, and the first Outsider to set foot on the Americas' shores, since the migrations across the Bering land bridge in
prehistoric times.But what if this wasn't true? What if he were only following in the footsteps of others What if the exploring went both in and out of the "New World"?
Long before Columbus usherd in a new era, there were civilizations and cultures that had accomplished prodigious feats of exploration, and built vast maritime trading empires. The accepted view that these civilizations were too frightened of sailing the vast oceans is Eurocentric, and results from the religious fears that gripped the Western consciousness during the Dark Ages, rather than upon scientific experimentation.
The transoceanic contact debate, which has consequently arisen, has two main groups: the Diffusionist and the
Insolationist. The Diffusionist group postulates--based upon plants, linguistics, and similarities in
art and architecture--that various cultures had contact with one another across vast distances and even oceans, and that they naturally had some influence on one another. The
Isolationist group contends, instead, that the "Old" and "New" Worlds did not have contact. They believe that the similarities between separate cultures (such as pyramids) are purely coincidental, the result of the spontaneous invention that occurs as humanity "progresses" to greater cultural complexity.
The Isolationist view, however, has a major problem: anomalous items that point
towards intercontinental contact are being discovered, such as nicotine and cocaine (strictly New World plant by-products), found within Egyptian mummies that were interned for centuries before Spain funded the voyage of Columbus.
Peru has traditionally grown coca, a lucrative trade item, but the modern trade in Peruvian archeological items is also rapidly growing. Architecture that resembles Peruvian styles can be found on Easter Island, and Peruvian pottery has been discovered in the Galapagos Islands, suggesting that some ancient American civilizations had voyaged across the Pacific.
By the time that Europeans reached them, Madagascar, Easter Island, the Polynesian Islands, and other island nations were already long inhabited. If humans migrated, across vast distances, to Australia, why not elsewhere?
Thor Heyerdhal, the Norwegian ethnologist who is best-known for his historic journey on the Kon-Tiki raft 1947), and whose experiments are unfairly regulated to the realm of pseudoscience, undertook them only to prove his theory of Peruvian migrations and explorations possible, not that he felt they had populated the Pacific.
Heyerdahl's experiments have been undermined by authors who suggest that various ancient cultures had founded Continental US settlements. These authors point to rusted coins, armor, vague historical references, and even spurious markings on rocks, as proof of their ideas. There are many fascinating and well-argued theories about ancient maritime cultures . . . and a thousand more crackpot ideas about global commerce in the prehistoric era.
Could there really have been ancient cultures, whose explorers plied the waves unafraid, bound only by their imagination? Yes, we are now discovering evidence that these cultures may have existed, and, as a result, our view of ancient history will be changed forever.